OMG. Today you have done it again: I have swallowed the coffee and I almost seriously injured the palm face.
I have nothing against freedom of the press, but something on the front page of print already requires good self-confidence. As they say on the internet: Think before you say something stupid.
Srsly.
The text of the commentary can be found here: http://www.suedkurier.de/news/kommentare/kommentare/art411651, 3823302
I can not comment there, because my mother does not even know their own user name on skype, so I can hardly ask the customer number at the newspaper ...
But this can be seen as a happy letter to the editor:
[ Voters] are now the Gelackmeierten because the deputies they trust the SPD, for which he was leaving, but retains the mandate. "
Hello! Will there protesting about someone Basic Law Article 38?
"The members of the German Bundestag are elected by universal, direct, free, equal and secret elections. They are representatives of the people, not bound by orders or instructions and only to their conscience. "
here because of my opinion is nothing 'If party was abandoned, may delegate to do nothing more". Here is what not even because of 'party member must belong' and certainly not 'party is important in any way. "
Also: Deputies Act:
"Eleventh Section
fractions
§ 45
factions
(1) Members of the Bundestag People got together to can-
fractions.
(2) will be regulated by the Rules of Procedure of the German Federal
tages.1)
§ 46
status
(1) The groups are unincorporated associations of remoteness folder
th in the German Bundestag.
(2) The political groups may sue and be sued.
(3) The groups are not part of the public administration;
they do not engage in public violence "
Group means in practical party or interest group in the Bundestag.. Here is quite clear that they have nothing to say.
is clear, it is chosen a man, not the party behind it. A party outlet or exchange is legal in any case.
"With their votes, it now represents the Pirate Party, which holds up to total freedom on the Internet, the skull will also flag the worst waste such as child pornography on behalf tolerate freedom of expression. "
...
...
...
$)#?!
WHAT DO?
Südgeschmier, because I had two methods of Informationsbeschafftung, that are better than yours.
first http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piratenpartei
second Google: "Pirate Party" -> click on the most official-looking page -> if still clear, type something into the search field, such as child pornography -> improve article.
honest.
The Pirate Party does as well as anyone who thinks more than half a minute on the Internet block tends to explode, while paying conveniently opens the door for other grades. And that it would question the children help a lot more if we the people behind it convicted under existing laws and takes all of the websites online. For each page that a stop sign will get is well known, and could therefore be quite the same pursuit by the police.
Also:
"... the skull flag holding up ... worst waste such as child pornography will be tolerated in the name of freedom of expression. "
Um there is no skull flag? Just a flag, without skull. You know, SPD-red irritated me so well always, and CDU-black looks wicked, but that's why I write but no hate articles?
There is no worst garbage, there is a danger that is recognized and with which one must deal with. And not by schlimmreden and for the average consumer to lock away, so yes it will disappear from the public interest.
freedom I think is great! But not if children's and human rights are violated.
And the Pirate Party does not tolerate child pornography. Short google and just look at headline also helps in this case.
"Whether his voters agree, can seem cold Tauss. "
Some of it may be, some not. But 64.4% wanted him anyway, never, so I would not spending too much thought ;-)
"They were this year has taken a battering. A member of parliament, the threat of prosecution on suspicion of child pornography possession is bad enough. That the man now even vote abused is simply unbearable. "
not you write great stuff? Well.
"abused still vote" was probably a clever play on words be, but PLEASE! I would abstain from any comment on its debt until a formal condemnation is there.
It is intolerable that powerful. What do we do now? According to scream and keep your ears? Or for a change, think maybe?
"As the parliament is not imperative, but free elections in personality has acquired mandates, Jörg Tauss' insistence on the parliamentary seat legally. Legitimate, however. Decency and respect for the voters areas but one thing: The immediate abandonment of the mandate. "
Had a bit stupid. Do not make more noise would not be bad. If convicted, he may not always yes. To renounce the mandate would be stupid because then everyone could come and accuse someone, he would have done something wrong, because he knows that he will back down.
And what happens if he would do without? Elections? -> Voters will be distorted. Party replacement? -> Voters to say anything more. No member of this constituency? -> As a voter I'd feel even more cheated!
... The PPD provides advice and even even if they record it. If convicted, they will throw him out guarantees that will be covered from all sides. "Delete instead of locks" is their motto to the Internet Filter.
![[info]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sD7ErxI1-Uv69y9povIPOAiMg8ibX4SbngVwXsMkbpt7ieB2qt_03_5jruxJUlnCm6C9hrMsrPCNwaXUuJ4M4dEIYFTEj0IMts0xDVFjPC-oZIbQ=s0-d){kind=small}
![[info]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tGhXxw-TyHtzKjw6e6To_pd5e8ftQf6krxFX-neODD2iVCQ6j3YksUdUEZoDVda20-9bjtduyJEP-YwGs7AvP5tOjUUchQgAgcHgwtWpcIDi9A6657aw=s0-d){kind=small}
